But most of them are interlinked to the story, plot, and characters. When you sit down to write a screenplay, you have so many things to figure out. Or you can spend $500 on Automatic Duck's Pro Export FCP plugin, in order to get an exportable timeline out of a $300 program. Still, the inability to share FCP X timelines with other apps is a deal-breaker for team-based MGFX work - for now.
Adobe has more advanced tools but the workflow and speed of Apple's (at least in use, by not having to take it out to a separate app) is more streamlined. However, this test is also a good example of the divide in Adobe and Apple's (new) philosophy: Adobe's stabilization requires a separate motion graphics app, while Final Cut Pro X's is built-in. The FCP X video has a jump in it that After Effects corrects. Yes, the After Effects one looks smoother. No tweaking was done whatsoever." Here's the video comparison between the two: In posting this test, Steve Forde at Adobe says, "both After Effect's Warp Stabilizer and FCPX stabilization were left to the default settings of stabilization and rolling shutter removal. So let's take a look at one feature both video solutions are touting highly: automatic camera stabilization. I'm still learning FCP X and I think it has a ton of potential, but at the very least, Adobe has to be happy with the missing features in FCP X that everyone's complaining about. It seems perfect timing for Adobe, whose application is now easier to migrate to from Final Cut Pro 7 than is Apple's. Then Apple relaunches FCP from the ground up - and removes a lot of the features shared between the two, making Premiere Pro undeniably more feature-rich. Let's review: Adobe Premiere Pro reaches feature parity with Final Cut Pro, exceeding it in some aspects, and in the process builds up an equal-sized customer base as Apple's NLE.
0 kommentar(er)
